Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.
Paula Tudoran
Sat, Mar 29, 2025, 9:00 AM 3 min read
Dollar cost averaging is a popular strategy among investors who want to increase their exposure to the stock market without having to time the market. It involves buying stocks at regular intervals regardless of the market price.
It's a lot simpler if you apply this strategy to mutual funds and ETFs. Those funds offer diversified exposure to a wide range of stocks, but one Redditor is considering the dollar cost averaging method for individual stocks.
Don't Miss:
-
Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – Many are rushing to grab 4,000 of its pre-IPO shares for just $0.26/share!
-
Are you rich? Here’s what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy.
In an Investing Reddit post, an individual explains that they put $300 into their investment account bi-weekly. Now, the Redditor wants to put an extra $200 into the account bi-weekly and put that money into individual stocks. The Redditor mentioned a few blue-chip stocks and intends to follow that path for the next 20-40 years.
Before committing to it, the Redditor asked the community if dollar cost averaging into individual stocks is a good investment strategy.
The top comment offered a blunt assessment of the situation. "No! Just buy ETFs," the commenter stated. Buying ETFs is a lot simpler since you can follow benchmarks and themes instead of knowing about individual stocks. It takes less time to monitor ETFs since a fund manager does that for you.
While you can outperform the stock market if you buy individual stocks, it is riskier. The average investor is better off with ETFs.
Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it?
One commenter suggested that the best investment strategy is to put all of your money into the stock market when you are young. The idea behind this strategy is that investors get to enjoy more compounding growth in the long run.
The commenter advocated for dollar cost averaging but didn't say if buying individual stocks was a good approach or a bad one. This comment is probably more geared toward the Redditor deciding to invest an additional $200 bi-weekly. That extra investment can compound over time.
The Redditor will endure some corrections as a stock investor. However, the original poster also mentioned having a 20-40 year time horizon. A lengthy time horizon makes it easier to realize profits from your investments when you are ready to sell them or pass them on to your heirs.
Comments