Stephen Miller calls out CNN anchor's 'lazy assumptions' about Trump's executive power

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller called out CNN's Pamela Brown's "lazy assumptions" regarding the Trump administration's executive power during an appearance on "The Situation Room" on Friday.

Miller rejected the notion that district judges should have to "green light" each individual policy directive or executive order that President Donald Trump implements, claiming that it challenges the will of the voters who put him in office.

The Supreme Court on Friday stayed a lower court order that blocked the Trump administration from deporting roughly 500,000 migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. The decision is a near-term victory for Trump as he moves to crack down on border security and immigration priorities in his second term.

SUPREME COURT HANDS TRUMP WIN ON REVOKING PAROLE FOR 500K FOREIGN NATIONALS

Miller argued that requiring district judges to approve each individual policy directive or executive order that the president implements challenges the will of the voters who put him in office.

The order stays, for now. The lower court ruling halted Trump's plans to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for some migrants living in the U.S., which allows individuals to live and work in the U.S. legally if they cannot work safely in their home country due to a disaster, armed conflict or other "extraordinary and temporary conditions." 

Brown asked Miller whether he believes district judges should just "rubber stamp" whatever the Trump White House does, and if not, what checks and balances he thinks should be in place.

"It’s not the job of a district court judge to perform an individual green light or red light on every single policy that the president takes as the head of the executive branch," Miller replied. "Just think about the premise baked into your question. Respectfully, Pam, you’re saying that when the American people elect a president of the United States of America…"

Brown interrupted before he could finish his thought, claiming that her words were being taken out of context, and that she was just asking what checks and balances should be in place.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

"I will answer the question happily," Miller responded. "But look, when you have these kinds of lazy assumptions built into questions, it makes it hard to have a constructive dialogue."

The Trump administration's Supreme Court win on Friday temporarily removed deportation protections for approximately 500,000 migrants currently residing in the United States. (JEFF KOWALSKY/AFP via Getty Images)

The CNN anchor asked what "lazy assumptions" he thought she was making.

Miller began to argue that district judges should not individually approve each executive action implemented by the president, but was interrupted by Brown stating that her question was being misinterpreted. She went on to clarify that she was questioning what checks and balances the Trump official felt were appropriate.

Brown contended that her question about whether judges are expected to "rubber stamp" White House decisions was reasonable, before giving Miller the floor to finish his argument.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"When you say, ‘Do we think district court judges should rubber stamp each action’ — there is a premise that is built into that that is absurd," he asserted. "The president is the sole head of the executive branch. He’s the only officer in the entire government that’s elected by the entire American people." 

"Democracy cannot function — in fact, democracy does not exist at all if each action the president takes - foreign policy, diplomatic, military, national security - has to be individually approved by 700 district court judges," he continued. "That’s democracy? So if there’s 15 communist, crazy judges on the court, that each of them as a team working together can block and freeze each and every executive action?"